Log in / Sign up
 
    Share this page

    Gold

    Advertisement

    Reviewed by
    adamwatchesmovies@

    “Gold” isn’t a bad movie and should you go in with moderate expectations you’re likely to have a good time with. I did thanks to Matthew McConaughey’s transformation (performance doesn’t quite cut it as a description) and some of the developments towards the end. Nonetheless, the film is a disappointment.

    Kenny Wells (McConaughey) has a dream, one no investor believes in. When his mining company finds gold in Indonesia, he and his partner Michael Acosta (Édgar Ramírez) start riding the money train. But this is a movie; one that’s based on a true story, so you know the good times won’t last.

    You’ve got to hand it to McConaughey. Even when he’s in a film that isn’t great, he makes the most of his role. He steals the show and isn’t afraid to show himself as a fat, balding, ugly grinned loser if it’ll serve the role he’s in. The names of the people involved in the real-life story have been changed for “Gold”, so we never find out what any of these people REALLY looked, but he can’t be far off.

    “Gold” suffers from the fact that you can’t help but compare it to other, better films. Admit it, the instant you saw a trailer for this picture, you pictured another “The Wolf of Wall Street” or “The Big Short”. This picture – nay – this story, fictionalized or not just isn’t on the same level. Kenny Welsh is not a memorable character. You get to know him a bit, but he’s not that funny, or quirky, and the picture just isn’t directed with the flair necessary to elevate it. Some craziness from the cinematographer or weirdness from the director would’ve made the film stand out.

    “Gold” is not a bad film, but it doesn’t have much of an identity. I can’t foresee this film leaving a lasting impression – even a negative one. It’s a one-and-done. I’m glad I saw it, I was curious to see how it would wrap up, but “Gold” is not the Oscar contender you might’ve expected when you first saw the trailers. (theatrical version on the big screen, February 7, 2017)

    5
    HelpfulNot helpful  Reply
    adamwatchesmovies@  12.2.2017 age: 26-35 2,886 reviews

    Show all reviews for this movie
    Note: The movie review posted on this page reflects a personal opinion of one user. We are not responsible for its content.

    Did you see ''Gold''?

    There is a problem with your e-mail address and we are unable to communicate with you. Please go to My Account to update your email.

    How do you rate this movie?

    Select stars from 1 to 10.
    10 - A masterpiece, go, see it now
    9 - Excellent movie, a must see
    8 - Great movie, don't miss it
    7 - Good movie, worth seeing
    6 - Not bad, could be much better
    5 - So so, okay if you don't pay
    4 - Not good, even if you don't pay
    3 - Poor movie, not recommended
    2 - Very bad, forget about it
    1 - Worst ever, avoid at all costs

    Please explain. Write your comment here:

    Please choose a username to sign your comments. Only letters, digits, dash - or period. Minimum 4 characters.

    Your age and sex:

    We publish all comments, except abusive, at our discretion.