47 user reviews
6.1
/10
| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
- 0 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
4.3 3 |
6.8 9 |
7.4 9 |
6.7 21 |
| Women: Votes: |
- 0 |
- 0 |
4.7 4 |
4.9 8 |
6.4 7 |
6.8 5 |
5.7 24 |
| Total: Votes: |
- 0 |
- 0 |
4.7 4 |
4.8 12 |
6.6 16 |
7.2 14 |
6.1 47 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
All 47 reviews...
Not my cup of tea. Slow, draggy out, if you are a die hard Sarah Polley fan you will certainly enjoy it.
| 5/10 | shazjoao@ - 1728 reviews 28.2.2013 |
A bit surprised to see that many low ratings for this film. Personally, I enjoyed the story and the acting. Didn't mind the slow pace and the couple's childish, quirky games they play with one another. I did agree with the majority of fans about the the nudity parts. It wasn't necessary to the story.
| 7/10 | karen_lett@ - 361 reviews 30.9.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I am a huge fan of Sarah Polley, however did not like this film at all. I found myself hoping it would end - never a good sign in a movie! The acting was very good, it was just not an enjoyable movie to watch with a storyline both depressing and pointless.
| 5/10 | miranda@ - 19 reviews 23.7.2012 - age: 26-35 |
I did not enjoy this movie. Half way through I looked over at my friend and said I hope there is a point to this movie, sadly there wasn't. There are scene in the movie that I deem unnecessary. The plus sides of this movie was the acting by Seth Rogen and Sarah Silverman. I am disappointed in this film, I hope for better.
| 4/10 | commonireland@ - 5 reviews 23.7.2012 - age: 26-35 |
"Take This Waltz" is one of the worst, most self-indulgent movies I've seen in a very long time. It was almost like a student film from someone who hasn't yet learned yet how to tell a story and develop characters. Michelle Williams and Seth Rogen play one of the most ANNOYING and unconvincing couples in movie history; while Michelle Williams plays one of the most annoying female lead characters ever. This is NOT the fault of the actors, but of the writing and directing which is the main problem with "Take This Waltz" - a film which meanders endlessly around the obvious under the pretense of being "quirky" and "unconventional": while the subplots and the message of the film remain utterly pointless. In addition, the behaviour and motivation of the characters are so bizarre and implausible that it removes any sympathy from the audience for them or their plight, leaving one with nothing but disdain for them and the entire film experience. Again, this is NOT the fault of the actors, but mainly of the writing and directing.
| 1/10 | reeld.@ - first review 22.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
This tops my list as one of the worst movies I have ever had the misfortune of sitting through. The movie felt less like entertainment and more like a punishment, perhaps my only crime was sitting in the theatre in the first place. Riddled with painfully awkward dialoge, unnecessary scenes, over-indulgence in so-called insight from someone who has clearly not lived. True human emotion and experience cannot just be invented on a screenplay. Sara Polley falls short in rendering anything that even resembles accuracy; and with a film that looks like her only goal is to portray "real people", what is the point if you have failed? The male protagonist is emasculated, the female protagonist is stupid, in the end there is no reason to care about anyone in the movie. The most important flaw of all - NOTHING IS HAPPENING. What is the event? What is the conflict? Who cares? Sara Silverman seems to be sprinkled on the top of the movie for decoration. Oh yeah, and she's an alcoholic. Super. In any case, I felt sorry for the males in the room. I would have left if I'd had the chance, but I was in the premiere last year at TIFF - stuck in the middle row. What to say about the shower scene? I'll never have any idea... The ending was the most painful part of all; the final middle finger for anyone who was still watching. The movie had nowhere to go, so an arbitrary ending might as well be thrown in for decoration. Another tick in the box for Canadian film school rubbish. "Take This Walz and Shove It"
| 1/10 | meepsterk@ - first review 20.7.2012 - age: 26-35 |
The best English-language Canadian film I've ever seen, and one of the best films of the year. Sarah Polley's direction is superb and evocative, and her script is powerful, witty and unpredictable even as it tells a story of love and bad decisions that should resonate with anyone. Michelle Williams stands out even amongst a stellar cast, bringing Margot's passion and anguish beautifully to life.
| 9/10 | stampimo@ - 91 reviews 18.7.2012 - age: 26-35 |
While there are many great moments there are also a few moments that aren't so great. The beginning and ending felt like they were from two different movies and sewn together. Although the moral of the story overall is quite true.
| 6/10 | jdarling@ - first review 17.7.2012 - age: 26-35 |
I love great apartments and the pedicab driver really finds great places to live -- amazing on the salary he probably earns. I'm stuck between a 6 and 7 rating -- I really need to be able to award a 6.5 -- I enjoyed the movie, but would not exactly call it "worth seeing" -- and "not bad" seems a little understated. It was pleasant viewing and I didn't find myself bored in the 2 hours -- on the other hand, it was just entertaining, not thought provoking, no unexpected twists -- plain but enjoyable.
| 6/10 | lostcat@ - 4 reviews 16.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
An unrealistic ficticious portrayal of an urban couple living in Toronto. I am a fan of Away From Her, Sarah Polleys directorial debut. Though this time around she struck out on integrity and class. Had the whole story been a dream when she woke up you would smile and clap. Instead you leave feeling uninspired and worthless. A very poor attempt with a very lame climax.
| 3/10 | rls@ - 59 reviews 15.7.2012 - age: 18-25 |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
A lot of reviewers are angry at Michelle Williams' character. But that's the story essentially - Two very different people married to each other and hitting the 5-6 year mark. They also show a very normal and rather boring husband on an anniversary dinner not making the least bit of effort. It is the kind of marriage that goes on until some sort of trigger is pulled. Enter a handsome neighbour, instant chemistry with the bored wife and poof goes the marriage. But the thing is No marriage goes poof until there is something wrong with it to begin with. It is a mirror of the times we live in. Couple of lessons: 1. Do not marry early 2. As per Sarah Silverman "Life has gaps. You do not go crazy trying to fill them" 3. New gets Old.
| 7/10 | impi@ - 33 reviews 13.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
This film needs some work. Not even close to hitting the target. However, nice to see a Canadian film trying at least. The subject material is for adults only; don't bring your kiddies in.
| 2/10 | noufnouf1@ - 32 reviews 13.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
I'm a fan of Sarah Polley's work but this film fell a bit short for me. Although the story, and even the baby talk and stimulation games behaviours, were realistic for any time, the slowness of the pacing combined with Williams' similar acting pace caused it to seem contrived and even a bit tiresome at times. Enjoyed Seth Rogan's role and portrayal of it. I can see though that it would appeal to some people.
| 6/10 | macpisces@ - 2 reviews 13.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
The script is most interesting and in my opinion the title may have read something like The Gap, Fear of The Connection, The Missed Connection and so on - The storyline revolves around that theme and alot of the movie conveys what takes place when over familiarity turns to downright silliness - childlike behaviours - strange phrases of affection. The film is simply filmed and most of it takes place on a segment of a rather comfortable homey street and house with pretty colours abounding in Toronto. Michelle William's acting is intense and her expressions speak volumes even without words. In my opinion, the chemistry and connection with her and Luke Kirby is pretty good and quite believable. I think that most of the segments and scenes and lines were there for a reason and reasons. This is more of complex film than one may think - there are subtle layers. The ending comes on too fast - stunning the audience and posing more questions - which actually left me somewhat unsatisfied. The last parts were jerky in comparison with the strong, emotional, some would say slow first and middle parts of the movie. Well done though for the most part and enjoyable and makes one ponder relationships over time, chances, choices, and so much more.
| 8/10 | ponderingred@ - 35 reviews 13.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
Wow, so much to say. Not as humorous as I thought it would be, considering some of the actors and critiques. For me, this film was interesting, slow to start, but evolved eventually into a tender, sensitive, dramatic, lightly humourous and insightful film. Smart writing, producing and directing and I believe it to be, a statement of our times. I liked the writing of Sarah Polley and I think that the scenes such as the raw nudity and the "baby talk," were purposely inserted, and not intended to be erotic, nor funny. I believe there were messages there. Michelle Williams, Luke Kirby and Seth Rogen all portrayed real characters, with a very humane approach re their inner selves and a brilliant display of heir struggles in life and how they cope with them, especially in the "gaps." Sarah Silverman, whom I have never seen on the stage, reaffirms these statements about life in her dramatic, funny, real and smart self. (sadly not always smart herself) My heart went out to all three main characters, for different reasons. I felt for them even after the movie ended. It stayed with me. There was the odd scene that I felt unnecessary that detracted from the picture. The music was enjoyable and the score, sadly beautiful as was the movie. Toronto Beaches and Nova Scotia made attractive settings and provided meaning for the characters. I think the movie was a fine film with some not so covertly important messages. Life is about evolving and reflecting, otherwise we have no growth. At the end, does Margot start her growth or? The final scene leaves us with some questions. After all, life is not perfect. There are always unanswered questions and we cannot go from "boat to boat." We must swim the waters in between. Go see the film. It really leaves you with an awakening.
| 8/10 | elwalker48@ - 24 reviews 11.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
It was the most boring movie I've seen in a long time! Very slow. Also, what's with all the nudity? What was the purpose of the threesome at the end? I don't know If I didn't understand it, but really didn't see the point.
| 2/10 | nonca18@ - first review 11.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I'm a big fan of Sarah Polley and I wish her work would get more exposure. I was pleased with the movie, and the performance by the talented Ms. Williams. However, Ms Polley could have cut down on some part of the movie.
| 6/10 | sentenza99@ - 599 reviews 11.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Sarah Polley would have crafted a small masterpiece... if only she had ended the film ten minutes earlier than she did. If Sarah had ended the film with the solo scene of her female protagonist (Margot) alone at the edge of the lake left silently pondering her fate as determined by her own actions... Polley could lay claim to genuine storey telling greatness. Unfortunately, thereafter she takes us on a clumsy journey of the absurd indulgence, suspected bliss and self-doubt of Margot. This causes much of the wonderfully crafted symmetry and tension of the film to unravel into a sloppy heap contemporary desires and cliches. Too bad... for something truly sublime was within reach. Outstanding performances from all cast members. Luke Kirby demonstrates great potential on the big screen. Seth Rogen presents an endearing sense of true humanity. Michelle Williams picks up from where she left of in 'Blue Valentine'... which is to say that... she is terrific.
| 8/10 | enodesign@ - 3 reviews 9.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
Enjoyed it a lot. Was not bored as is the case with a lot of movies I see nowadays.
| 7/10 | curlingbum@ - 2 reviews 9.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
At the beginning, I thought Margo has a mental illness. It turned out the only thing she suffered from was un-grateful idiot syndrome. There is nothing original about the story. The nudity was un-necessary and ugly. You try the whole movie to fight temptation, then you succumb, and so another new becomes old. Kudos for the wonderful colors, but other than that... Blekh.
| 3/10 | dia_sb_11@ - 15 reviews 9.7.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Where should I start. Really, what's the point of this movie? It's depressing, doesn't have plot or dialogue, it's slow, bad music... Michelle Williams is terrible as well as Ted Rogers. The only good thing of the movie is that it's filmed in TO. Really a nightmare.
| 1/10 | gaferna@ - 44 reviews 8.7.2012 - age: 26-35 |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Okay, have to say, was pretty underwhelmed by it. The marriage in question was depicted in a very childish and immature way, just found Williams and Rogen pretty annoying and idiotic after awhile, hearing their cutesy baby-talk to each other and that weird game they play to show how much they "love" each other by thinking of the most violent things they would do to each other (gag!) Luke Kirby (the guy Williams is seduced by) ended up coming across as way more stable, intelligent and with a decent head on his shoulders compared to the other two. Another poster said this and I agree - it felt too staged and choreographed at times. I really hate movies that end up feeling contrived and self-conscious, like the director is trying too hard to evoke a certain dynamic with the choice of scenery, acting and dialogue, that ends up feeling pretentious and with a very forced "hipster" vibe. Yeah, we get it, they live in T. O's uber-hipster neighbourhood, they have quirky and eclectic clutter in their house that seems haphazard but is all really artfully chosen and displayed just so, they of course have Feist in the background while everyone's dancing at their summer house party. Well there's my two cents. Wait, here's two more: I also think the threesome scenes towards the end totally detracted from the whole story, and that's where I finally lost patience with whatever Sarah Polley was trying to achieve with this movie - it made you question whether she put those scenes in merely to add shock-value and so she can be perceived by the public as a "cool and daring avant-garde" director (hoo boy!) That's what it felt like. Other audience members were also groaning in annoyance. Instead of having any sympathy with Williams' character, those scenes pretty much erased that because it just rendered her even more self-absorbed and irresponsible (than she already seemed to be) and a lot of her supposed character development implausible.
| 3/10 | spoodles7@ - 17 reviews 7.7.2012 - age: 36-49 - One reply |
Beautiful movie! Michelle Williams acting is superb. Sarah Polley's play on image, facial expressions, music, colours is outstanding. I appreciated her unpretencious, real and human approach to the storyline. Well done!
| 10/10 | annemarie@ - first review 7.7.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Although not for everybody (not a blockbuster, not an action film) Take This Waltz is a brilliant, careful, sensitive, funny, sad, daring, bold, creative, insightful film about the complex dynamics of relationship, passion, chemistry, and coming to terms with life. There are no cliches, and Michelle Williams' performance is luminous, with no false moments. Sarah Silverman and Seth Rogen are perfectly cast. This is a very thoughtful movie, by a film-maker who observes life from the inside out.
| 9/10 | davidschatzky@ - 22 reviews 7.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
This film tries too much to fit the mould, but falls very short of a good film. It's too long, feels too staged or choreographed and doesn't have the tension or chemistry that one would expect if the relationship has caused a wondering eye... Such a shame too b'cuz I like to support Canuk flics.
| 3/10 | essiejustleft@ - 16 reviews 6.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
I can't help but think that the homage to the Graduate scene early in the film is what drives the tone and mood of this film. It can be heart wrenching at times and there is a feeling of realism and yet like the Graduate it often fails to draw you in. The choices that Polley makes are interesting but at times they seem contrived the nude scenes for example. I had to love this film in the end because it leaves you with questions not answers, I love the film but not the Margot character but maybe that is the point.
| 8/10 | eeekitty@ - 2 reviews 4.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
No, this flic didn't cut it for me. Achingly slow at times and unnecessary nudity that you don't want to see... some people shouldn't be nude in films. The story is disjointed and Polley is disappointing. I was hoping for more bcuz it's a Canadian film and even rooting for the characters to fix it at the beginning, but no go.
| 3/10 | joeljustleft@ - 270 reviews 4.7.2012 - age: 26-35 |
A little too artsy fartsy for me. There are some good moments but overall, slow, awkward and redundant in many places and didn't feel the sexual tension that the characters should have been creating. Seth is ok in a non funny role but it was strange for him to be just a regular Joe.
| 6/10 | jilljustleft@ - 309 reviews 4.7.2012 - age: 18-25 |
I gave this a 10 because I feel Polly created something unusual. A very human movie based on real feeling characters, great camera work, music and great acting. And acting at the level where people's facial expressions and hand gestures carry as much weight as the dialogue. Visually stunning. In places But it is a character driven movie, the tension in the movie driven by the internal conflict that the main character is feeling. She has also created a number of memorable scenes which stay with you after the movie is over. Polly explores territory that many people experience in a way that has you feeling for many of the characters without going into soap opera territory. Great film.
| 10/10 | belro19@ - 98 reviews 4.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
This a crackerjack of a movie. Captivating performance by Michele Williams. Seth Rogen, Sarah Silverman and Luke Kirby were wonderful too. Toronto was almost another character, its neighbourhoods and environment was so vividly captured, it seemed like a glorious painting at times. Its exploration of relationships is both complex and deep, with no tidy answers.
| 9/10 | tamcho10@ - 22 reviews 3.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I had high hopes because I like the actors/director so much, but this movie ends up just being about dull hipsters, being dull, and realizing that infidelity doesn't solve being dull (shocking!) It's slow moving. It feels long. The nudity and sex seem like they're trying to seem casual and nonchalant, but feels forced and contrived. This whole movie felt like it was trying hard to be artsy and angsty, but it ends up being boring and self-serious and feeling shallow (except when Sarah Silverman is on screen - she's great) I say skip it.
| 2/10 | cowtown@ - first review 3.7.2012 - age: 26-35 - One reply |
I wanted to like this film since our very own Sarah Polley wrote, directed and produced it. But... it was boring and nonsensical. I don't want to sit through two hours to watch an immature woman come to grips with the nuances of identity and love. It was completely unrealistic that her neighbour would find her remotely attractive, physically or mentally. The childish rituals shared by her and her husband got old very quickly, to the point I questioned their sanity. Basically I did not feel I could root for anyone in this film, including the husband since he too had the maturity of a gnat. Their wedding anniversary restaurant scene demonstrated his cave man capacity at conversation, a sure bet their marriage was taking a nose dive. Sure, the underlying message in it all is there are no victims in divorce, only perpetrators. But I don't want to watch two hours of unbelievable and immature characters to swallow that pill, thank you very much.
| 4/10 | ablack90@ - 55 reviews 3.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
At first... when the movie started... into 40 minutes of it... I was thinking... wow this movie is slow, boring, Michelle Williams character is childish... a little odd... and what the HECK was up with the nude scenes? Seriously, when you see them... you will think... uhhhmm... was that REALLY necessary? I think not. A few of the scenes were extremely childish... but I guess the writer of the movie was trying to express the personality of the 2 main characters. However!!! This movie DID start to get a bit interesting... and was worth while... sort of. The storyline gets somewhat realistic... making me ALMOST tear up at some parts... and the end... really does show honest truth about certain things. I don't know, this one was something I wasn't expecting I guess. You have to go see it for yourself.
| 5/10 | smkb@ - 15 reviews 3.7.2012 - age: 18-25 |
This is what great movies are all about! Absolutely superb acting. One of the few films out today that would be a bargain at twice the price of admission!!!
| 10/10 | jimedgar2@ - 178 reviews 3.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
Great plot, great acting (Luke Kirby), and great to have Toronto just as Toronto (great to see its landmarks) instead of masquerading as an American city instead.
| 9/10 | yyc403@ - first review 2.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Excellent film, great camera, music and story... ! A must see... Sarah Polley is very talented director.
| 10/10 | amatuskova@ - first review 2.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
What a beautiful movie! Tender, heart-breaking, erotic and sweet. It's about love, lust and the longing for connection - with a partner, and also with yourself. Just gorgeous. Go see it.
| 8/10 | kccc@ - first review 1.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
This movie is well worth the movie. Michelle Williams fully encapsulates her role as a woman who is restless and bored with her marriage to the very likeable Seth Rogen. An honest portrayal of fidelity, passion and the paths we choose in life. A very worthy movie of your hard earned dollars. Also, I loved seeing all the Toronto landmarks.
| 8/10 | toronto@ - 14 reviews 1.7.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Really a beautifully sculpted film where I found myself caring for all 3 of the main characters. Very challenging role for Michelle Williams to pull off in that tug-of-war without looking like the evil woman. Casting was great and S. Polley is a gem.
| 9/10 | judgeoscar@ - 25 reviews 1.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
With the exception of one cheap/profane scene very early in the movie, it was very, very good. Writing and execution (acting, directing, art, music) were brilliant. All acting was exceptional - Michelle Williams and Seth Rogen; no surprise but, who knew Sarah Silverman could be so jaw-droppingly good in a dramatic roll. She had a small part (with great lines) and/but, made the very most of it - wow.
| 9/10 | sherrycircledot@ - first review 30.6.2012 - age: 50+ |
This film did have a few moments that made me laugh, but not as many as you'd expect considering Seth Rogen and Sarah Silverman being cast. Anyway, there were a few nude scenes that I found to be a tad gratuitous. I mean, had there been none at all - it would have been the exact same movie! Not even the swearing was necessary, and I was only really made aware of this because there were SO MANY older people in the audience, which I also did not expect. All in all, you won't be missing anything if you skip this one.
| 6/10 | rmishel@ - first review 30.6.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Michelle Williams, at only 5'4" tall, fills the screen when she is on it. In this film she has 3 personas, a weepy and misunderstood housewife being the one most frequently displayed. The delight for me was the performance of Sarah Silverman. Ms. Silverman has probably made a reasonable living throughout her career. Had she chosen the big screen rather than the small screen she would be a wealthy woman now. Lots of fun identifying the Toronto landmarks throughout the film.
| 7/10 | m.j.brown@ - 264 reviews 30.6.2012 - age: 50+ |
Not too entertaining character study of a young woman bored with her marriage who finds a way out after a chance meeting with a neighbour. I didn't see any chemistry between the main characters or anything really cute or funny in the odd interactions between the married couple. Wait for it to hit the small screen... tune in... and you will be sawing logs in 30 minutes.
| 5/10 | bbates103@ - 13 reviews 29.6.2012 - age: 50+ |
Powerful movie; liked the story, very interesting the three main charcters in the movie, the way it ended. I love the message; not lot of people have the courage to take a major decision to change their life and live happy. Life is short, enjoy!!
| 8/10 | greco64@ - 402 reviews 29.6.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Really good entertainement. I really appreciate this movie, refreshing.
| 9/10 | lordwhiteknight@ - 2 reviews 29.6.2012 - age: 36-49 |