








3.2| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
- 0 |
4 3 |
1 5 |
3.2 4 |
4 3 |
7 1 |
3.1 16 |
| Women: Votes: |
- 0 |
5 1 |
- 0 |
3 4 |
4 2 |
2 1 |
3.1 9 |
| Total: Votes: |
- 0 |
4.2 4 |
1 5 |
3.1 8 |
4 5 |
4.5 2 |
3.2 26 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
It had its moments and suspense. I would say that seeing a movie that's well done and not handheld like this deserves credit where it's due.
| 7/10 | shazjoao@ - 1728 reviews 2.12.2012 |
It was [....] interesting, funny to see in it the bad kid from Harry Potter... I had a good time seeing it, but never got a jumpy moment of scared at all... but I love all horror films.
| 6/10 | jaguar-soul@ - 49 reviews 20.11.2012 - age: 26-35 |
It was definitely frightening, however, the actors weren't giving their A-Game.
| 7/10 | drdrei96@ - first review 9.9.2012 - age: 13-17 |
Not about an apparition at all. Poor acting but when you haven't got a good story to work with who can blame the actors. Lack of coherency and a non-ending for an end. Doesn't even stand a chance to become a cult classic.
| 2/10 | vttbots@ - 3 reviews 4.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
I think the movie was a joke. Probably to see how long people would tolerate it before leaving the cinema. I want my money back. I want my 2 hours back. I want my dignity back.
| 1/10 | lucybc@ - first review 3.9.2012 - age: 26-35 |
The trailer did look really cool, so I thought this movie was going to be great. But to be honest, it really wasn't. It was a little bit creepy, a few scenes made me jump a little, but overall, I wouldn't recommend to watch this. It was a bit boring and strange, ESPECIALLY the ending. I couldn't understand it at all. To conclude, do not watch this movie if you think it is as it is shown in the trailer, because it isn't.
| 4/10 | marcr103@ - 50 reviews 30.8.2012 - age: 13-17 |
I was hesitating about seeing this movie because of the reviews but actually I really enjoyed it! Just the ending is confusing a bit.
| 7/10 | chantal-et-pierre@ - 3 reviews 29.8.2012 - age: 36-49 |
It was mildly entertaining. The movie itself isn't that scary and it is one of those things that is difficult to watch because you wonder how the actors can be so stupid. Like trying to nail a door shut to keep a ghost out? Pretty sure they can go through doors and walls and such, ya think? Hahaha Or let's walk slowly through a dark house instead of making a run for it? Besides occasional screaming, there really wasn't much in the way of acting at all. Well if you like horror and just have to see them all go for it but this is one scrapes the bottom of the barrel.
| 4/10 | visserf@ - 25 reviews 29.8.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Is this a movie? Even me I can make a better movie than that -_-
| 1/10 | mike_batista@ - first review 28.8.2012 - age: 18-25 |
I loved this movie! Looking forward to it being on Blu Ray. I would have changed the ending though.
| 8/10 | melkachuk@ - 2 reviews 28.8.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Entered the screening for this movie noticed no one here. But after finishing this movie, now I understand why no one was there. Terrible story structure but hey, it's good to see one of the Harry Potter boys in a movie other than HP.
| 1/10 | gamersgtn@ - 2 reviews 27.8.2012 - age: 18-25 |
Wow did I ever hate this movie! Like seriously I couldn't find a single part in this movie that actually interests me. Well actually the beginning was kind of interesting, it started off really dark and kind of spooky, but then the movie just carries on and then it just gets stupid. The story in this movie felt very rushed and the scares were a complete joke, I don't know a single person who will find this movie scary. You will probably find the movies The Ring and Paranormal Activity more scary than this one because this movie pretty much is a less scarier version of those two movies. So yeah speaking of someone who really doesn't like horror movies I really didn't like this movie at all, I thought it brought nothing fresh and nothing really exciting. I also thought the acting sucked! Ashley Greene and Sebastian Stan play the two leads in this movie and I for one don't believe their relationship, you can tell their acting, so that right there just tells you that they had bad chemistry, also their acting in general was pretty awful. Now as for Tom Felton, I thought he kind of disappointed me in this movie, I'm not saying he was bad in this movie I just thought he was kind of boring at times. I would say out of the whole cast members in this movie Tom Felton probably did the best job, but even him in this movie was kind of a let down. So yeah that pretty much sums it up, I really hated this movie. Besides the first little bit in the beginning there was nothing in this movie that I found good, I wasn't expecting to give this movie this low of a rating but it really was that bad. If you wanna go see a new movie I would suggest seeing the other new movies that came out because there probably much better than this movie.
| 1/10 | lil_shorty_69er@ - 391 reviews 27.8.2012 - age: 18-25 - One reply |
Movie was a waste of money to make-and a waste of time-- save your money folks go and watch a "real movie"... made absolutely zero sense ---- not scary at all-----period!
| 1/10 | cathy1cat@ - 6 reviews 26.8.2012 - age: 36-49 |
What is this... I don't even know what the producers were thinking. Avoid at ALL costs.
| 1/10 | supersuperspecial@ - first review 26.8.2012 - age: 26-35 |
This movie had so much potential! The opening made it seem so assuring that it would be good. Too bad it was all cheesy scripts, TERRIBLE acting, clearly a low budget movie, the backgrounds in a lot of scenes were obvious that it was a green screen. This movie could've been AMAZING if it were done by the right people. Horrible movie, NOT scary or disturbing at all. I think my girlfriend and I jumped maybe once... Terrible movie waste of money.
| 1/10 | aren_fener@ - 4 reviews 26.8.2012 - age: 18-25 |
I give this a seven cause, it is a good supernatural thriller. I enjoyed it. If u liked The Grudge and the like, the same genre so u should like. One review didn't like the end, but was fine the movie didn't go on and on. Can't wait for the new Sam Raimi-supernatural horror. Coming. If u like horror-thrillers this was a good movie. We've seen this before, but who doesn't like a ghost story.
| 7/10 | nilecatblue@ - 35 reviews 26.8.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Paranormal was a better movie and gave that a 1, avoid.
| 1/10 | luvstopleaseher@ - first review 25.8.2012 - age: 36-49 |
It has real potential to be a good movie, if only they hadn't pretended it was real and that the ending sucked.
| 1/10 | matt@ - 8 reviews 25.8.2012 - age: 13-17 |
If only the ending made more sense, it could be a great horror movie.
| 5/10 | dimar102@ - 32 reviews 24.8.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Waste the money,Ending made no sense at all.
| 2/10 | minminlover333@ - first review 24.8.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.