








6.6| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
8.4 13 |
7.3 47 |
6.4 65 |
6.2 94 |
5.9 95 |
6.3 46 |
6.4 364 |
| Women: Votes: |
9.4 8 |
7.7 44 |
6.8 46 |
6.6 53 |
6.5 28 |
7.2 25 |
7 206 |
| Total: Votes: |
8.5 23 |
7.5 95 |
6.6 112 |
6.2 154 |
6 127 |
6.7 74 |
6.6 599 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
If you must see this piece of crap end of the world movie see it on DVD and don't waste your money.
| 1/10 | morton35@ - first review 17.11.2009 - age: 50+ |
I believe this movie is not just about the physical survival of the earth, or merely the horror of the spectacular and cataclysmic effects that happen in the movie, but the critics that put down this movie may be missing that it is trying to tell the story of us trying to save the "Humanity" within us all, (not just the physical part of humanity) Great film.
| 9/10 | wolv162009@ - first review 17.11.2009 - age: 36-49 |
Dont't miss it. This is a awesome movie after the "The Day After tomorrow".
| 9/10 | soccocj@ - 2 reviews 17.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
It is a good movie. All these breathtaking scenes keep coming.
| 10/10 | yau_dickson@ - 3 reviews 17.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
Good movie, would see it again! But they really have to stop with the whole concept of Noah and the ark! It's boring and annoying! Good story line, makes you relise what global warming is doing to our planet. "that's a big ship! It's russin." lol loved that line!
| 8/10 | jimmyj96@ - first review 17.11.2009 - age: 18-25 |
It sucks... dont waist your money... wait to see it on dvd lol.
| 3/10 | quachhhh@ - first review 17.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
I will say this only once: "SAVE YOURSELF!! DONT SEE THIS MOVIE!!" Every disaster movie cliche seems to be hit by this director and yet people still go and seem his stuff, like me,.. stupid me... because we want to see a good disaster movie and the trailers look so goood, and yet we know underneath its going to be poo... and it was. So I'm really stupid... To help you understand my feelings: Acting = 0/10 Effects = 5/10,.. really. Good sequencing but nothing looked real enough for me still. You can tell its 'effects' that you are watching and the magic is gone. Add all that incredulous ducking and diving and the effects had no believability to them at all. Script = 'What script? ///... didnt they just make those terrible lines up as they went along.. ? Plot = So boring & slow, almost grinded to a hault on more than one occasion; due to terrible side story about characters you just couldnt care any less about. One of the kids names was 'Noah',... just made me feel weak to see the lameness,.. painfully obvious and pointless reference to nothing of any gravity what-so-ever. Ooh they mean 'Noah' in the BIBLE!! You spooked me man! Just another weak attempt by this sickly movie... Annoying kids, actors etc... just awful. Wats-his-name,.. the lead... John Cussack? What a souless actor, not that he had great lines to deliver but him going "Waaahhh!" and "Whhhoooaaa!!" whilst flying through impossible narrow and falling stuff made him look ridiculous,.. been done so many times, theres just no fun watching that kind of thing reprized every-time. No mention of Neburu either or the Sumarians, what a waste of time for the serious 2012 followers. Oh yeh, it turned into a really stupid 'Poseidon Adventure' rehash for the last 3rd,.. Ships? You've got to be kidding me... yaaawn... I knew when I saw that bit that the movie was about to sink to even lower depths... (pun intended) One thing though, and this is why I gave it a '1'.. it made me really tired and I'm ready for a good ole sleep after that yawn-fest.
| 1/10 | karlharvey1972@ - 15 reviews 17.11.2009 - age: 26-35 - One reply |
Amazing effects. Original concept.
| 9/10 | starzwillfall@ - first review 16.11.2009 - age: 26-35 - One reply |
Is wasting time and money. You will get out of this movie with big panful head.
| 4/10 | jimkociu@ - first review 16.11.2009 - age: 36-49 |
Again... garbage... dont go see it... not even on dvd... come on I wanted more!!
| 1/10 | samuel.preston@ - first review 16.11.2009 - age: 36-49 |
This is a raw raw raise the american flag, very poor acting, poor story and great f/x... movie. Expected so much more... too bad.
| 3/10 | lazguard@ - first review 16.11.2009 - age: 36-49 |
Very exciting movie. Special effects are fantastic! It's a fairly long movie, but the time went amazingly fast. Do "not" take Young children to see this film -it is too scary for them. I would give it a 9, but the Lord's name was taken in vain quite a few times, which I don't care for.
| 8/10 | jzslvzu@ - 34 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 50+ - One reply |
Really good on the special effects, but the story is so so, the usual no sense out of reality action which is nothing new.
| 5/10 | silverpepsiguy@ - 88 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
Damm that was boring, weve waited in a long line for 30 minuts on friday with high expectations. I knew there was gonna be cheesy moments cuz of the director but DAMM the whole movie is people crying and expressing their love and blablablabla, all the good explosions part are in the preview don't waste your money or your time there is way much better movies right now.
| 3/10 | phat_wack16@ - 6 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 18-25 |
The best movie ever!! Everyone will enjoy it, make sure you go see it.
| 10/10 | nickole--alord@ - first review 16.11.2009 - age: 13-17 |
It was too long and the limousine scene was so unreal that it took me out of the action... I want my money back...
| 5/10 | king1midas2@ - first review 16.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
It was oookkk but not more than that. Pathetich ending and a lot of hollywood cliche... Im not too scared of 2012... never was and now am even less.. actually not at all.
| 5/10 | akoklyagina@ - 2 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 18-25 |
Worth a watch if you're really into special effects and armageddon type movies. Very predictable. If you're looking for a good story line and plot, this is not your cup of tea.
| 6/10 | mikial_jan@ - 17 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
Do not waste your money. I Sooo wanted to like this movie! It could have been great, but unfortunately it SUCKED! Both my husband and I were very dissappointed. It seems to have been scripted for the stupid, gullible, naive people. Anyone with a brain will be insulted by this movie. The acting is terrible, the story line is totally ridiculous. How many one in a million/defying all odds streake of luck are we supposed to believe can happen to one person? The scene where the woman almost dies trying to save her stupid dog, while meanwhile millions of people are dying, was insulting to humanity.
| 2/10 | v-mccormick@ - first review 16.11.2009 - age: 26-35 - 2 replies |
This movie is so predictable, pretentious, pro-American (excessively), waaay to long, cliché and very Walt Disney-like. I know what you think : The special effects are at least worth the 12$ your gonna pay for it. No, they aren't. This movie isn't even worth the DVD rental.
| 1/10 | mimi@ - 8 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 18-25 |
First of all, this is the "disaster movie" to end all disaster movies. It has the best special effects I have ever seen in that regard and is truly a grandiose production never going short of the most exquisite shooting, beautiful cinematography and just a pleasure to watch. Now, with regards to the story, it's nice. You find yourself cheering for the unlikely hero that John's character plays. I saw unlikely because of the circumstances around what makes of him a hero in the end. Regardless, John is a gifted actor in all regards, making his presence seem effortless on the screen. I was truly impressed to see his acting. Altogether, I hardly think yo'd have to think twice about a movie like this. If youre thinking of seeing it. Don't think. Run.
| 9/10 | sacoca_@ - 656 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
[...] The movie is good, Awesome special effects, OK acting, a crappy storyline, a plot as good as a Tonka truck left in the sun hours straight! SOme parts of the movie are really ridiculous, especially Anotonov plane flying on only 1/2 engines for miles and miles, plz, the thing is so friggin heavy, it would fall after losing only 2 engines. The main characters shouldve died at least 50 times over, surviving a A-bomb like explosion) etc... makes it incredibly stupid I admit! Howevere, I didn't go in there to see a LOGICAL movie with only scientific-approved facts, I went in there to see a world get destroyed and I have to say I'm dissapointed, I mean seriously Afric remains intact WTF? Anyways, I give this movie a 8/10, Special effects, the time it lasted was well worth my money however the realism in the movie is just stupid! Think about it, if NASA feels the need to tell people that its all fiction, it can only say that something in the movie IS real! They just dont want to say it to the people, the very same way you see it in the movie! As for the people posting stupid comments liek: worst movie ever, I'm sure they never even saw the movie in the first ppace, if they cant elaborate, give some explanations, constructive facts then these same peopel should just HUSH and abstain from posting ANY comments. Please be constructive, even if you hate the movie, its all good! Please stop exagerating like saying OMG 10/10 best ever or 1/10 worst ever... Nuf said! Enjoy the movie!
| 8/10 | hikaru_fhg@ - 4 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
Great movie. Lots of action! Really makes you think!
| 8/10 | emmymaye@ - 48 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 13-17 |
The movie was horrible, it was supposed to be a disaster movie, there wasn't even close to enough disaster and violence.
| 1/10 | gagggg@ - first review 16.11.2009 - age: 13-17 - One reply |
Don't expect much of a storyline, just nice CGI, and destruction.
| 7/10 | big_bala14@ - 59 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 18-25 |
Good movie. [...] It was action packed and had a believable story and plot line in my opinion.
| 9/10 | murrayra@ - 3 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 36-49 |
Boring storyline, weak script. The only worth to see in this movie is the special effect. Could be better if they made it in 3D. If you have nothing to do then go see this movie. But it kinda long about 2hrs, my back was killing me during I watched this movie plus I have a crazy girl sat next to me was cried every disaster scenes, ^$%^%$^$ annoying!
| 6/10 | imkool0316@ - first review 16.11.2009 - age: 18-25 |
This movie did have much of a story but in regard to special effects, you'll get your money worth.
| 5/10 | sentenza99@ - 605 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
As far as natural disaster movies go, this was right up there for me. Special Effects were absolutely incredible and the story line was better than average. I enjoyed this movie and would suggest seeing it in the theatre for the effects!
| 8/10 | zeus2204@ - 7 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
This movie would actually have made a great prequel for an other horribly bad movie: Kevin Cosner's Waterworld! I expected great f/x and was not disappointed but I ended up laughing after a while, it was just too much. Great acting from the dog!!!
| 5/10 | lks1973@ - 13 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 36-49 |
It a good movie, great special effects. I enjoyed this movie.
| 7/10 | mariette.robichaud@ - 286 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 50+ |
2012-it really invoked emotions in me that even Oscar-winning movies could not do the same. It was a nice blend of action, love not just in the romantic sense, but for humanity, drama, and a dash of comedy. The special effects were first-class and it was so nice to see people from all walks of life and nations. John Cusack rocks!
| 9/10 | bonibasu@ - 6 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
To all those who gave this movie a 1 or 2... What did you expect?! It's a "fun ride, special effects, disaster flic"--nothing more. Blame yourself for not doing your research ahead of time. It was you who wasted your money not the movie. I give it an 8 for being good at what it set out to be. Must be seen on big screen.
| 8/10 | vanks57@ - first review 16.11.2009 - age: 50+ |
A catastrophe movie that turned catastrophic... very disappointed and I concur with everyone who scored this film as low as I did... nuff said.
| 5/10 | marchesso2005@ - 5 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 50+ |
A mixed reaction. Some folks applauded at the end of the movie... Definitely far fetched and one needs a very vivid imagination... All in all, not a bad movie, let's you think of what can happen if ever the earth does do funny things... Special effect both visual and sound were amazing..
| 7/10 | tonmig@ - 41 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 50+ |
If you like the unrealistic end of the world flicks (IE Armageddon) then you like this. It's entertaining but completely unlikely and not good enough to watch again... Deep Impact by far has been the best disaster movie yet.
| 5/10 | falactic@ - first review 16.11.2009 |
I saw this movie when it first came out but it has taken time for me to really absorb it and think about what I want to say about this one. Given that there are already movies out there like The Day After Tomorrow, Deep Impact and Armageddon; I would hope that movies have evolved. Well the CGI certainly has. It is the script that is still weak. The entire plot followed the doomsday formula of world eating itself up and natural disaster pending endangering our way of life. The hero of the film should have been a race car stunt driver instead of a writer. It seems only Billionaires will be able to afford the price of salvation. Oh and if you live in Africa, you're safe! There is an undertone of Biblical reference in this film as we see a Noah's Arc type prep by the leaders of the planet. The special effects in movies have come a long way and this movie shows off what can be done, but don't expect any brilliant performances. A "turn your brain off" type of movie simply meant to entertain you and reiterate a message we already should be very familiar with.
| 5/10 | paulleslie12@ - 409 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 36-49 |
2012 is entertaining and very well done visually. Story is adequate.
| 7/10 | pinksuperp@ - 5 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 36-49 |
I am a big fan of disaster movies. Outstanding visual effect, though the story has some moments quite cliche but I mean, it's always like that for disaster movies. Overall I really enjoy it, wouldn't mind watch it again.
| 10/10 | porkchopsandy@ - 31 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Good effects. Bad storyline, unreasonable scenes. (The main characters can't be the only ones who survive...
| 5/10 | slvrscrncrtc@ - first review 16.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
It's a great movie, story line is a little bit farfetched, but massive CGI effects is really worth to see. It's a big movie you must see in the theatres to feel "The end of world"...
| 8/10 | vanlover2006@ - first review 16.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
I thought it was really well done. What did you people want, that the main character dies in the first hour? IT'S A MOVIE PEOPLE!!! Of course the main character should have died 10 million times (which is the reason I gave it a 9) but then again, there would be no story, it would be more like documentary about 2012. And for those that went in expecting not the see destruction or any action, then you need to re-evaluate your judgement, it was quite clear what kind of movie this was!!! Oh and yes, if you're the kind of person who doesn't believe in global warming or 2012, or can't simply enjoy an entertaining movie, PLEASE avoid going to see it. On the other hand, I loved it, many intense moments, didn't find myself bored at all in any of the scenes, appreciated it for what it was, and seriously hope that these prophecies do not come true!!!
| 9/10 | nikki.keramati@ - 10 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 26-35 - 3 replies |
I think a lot of the poor reviews are givin by people who missed the point. I won't elaborate (as I don't want to give any of the movie away) but definitely worth seeing!
| 9/10 | jonsteen@ - first review 16.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
It was entertaining and the acting was good. Special effects were incredible. Excellent disaster movie.
| 8/10 | hoops_1974@ - 10 reviews 16.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.