Twilight
2194 user reviews
8.5
/10
| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
8.1 25 |
7.4 71 |
6.3 76 |
5.3 36 |
6.4 39 |
7.2 10 |
6.7 260 |
| Women: Votes: |
9.4 210 |
9.1 951 |
8.3 384 |
8.1 161 |
8.2 69 |
8.7 7 |
8.8 1812 |
| Total: Votes: |
9.2 244 |
8.9 1060 |
8 476 |
7.6 205 |
7.6 112 |
7.9 18 |
8.5 2194 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
Reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 2194)
Wasn't best movie but was worth it because I didn't pay for it.
| 5/10 | lance.g2012@ - 46 reviews 16.12.2012 - age: 13-17 |
There's some parts that are just a bit cheesy and some parts are rather abrupt. The acting wasn't all that great and some of the special effects were ninny-ish. I don't like how they completely changed some scenes. I'm not a big fan of the Twilight series, but I have read the books and I can say that the book is better. However I will say that the music was pretty good, especially in the car crash scene.
| 5/10 | theunknownfish999@ - first review 9.8.2012 - age: 13-17 |
It's only the little teenage girls that will get all giddy over a face they find attractive. The movie is garbage.
| 1/10 | countdraculasemai1@ - 39 reviews 7.6.2012 |
I was forced to watch this and all I saw was film making at its worst.
| 1/10 | ma5t3rofpupp3t52005@ - 4 reviews 12.4.2012 |
Twilight contains the WORST acting I've EVER seen in a movie and the WORST use of special effects. The script is horrific and the movie is a complete waste of time.
| 1/10 | ellgzninja_29@ - 11 reviews 10.4.2012 - age: 13-17 |
My new favourite movie of all time. Twilight is amazing!! Read the book and loved it. The movie I think is better.
| 10/10 | dem15@ - 17 reviews 16.11.2011 - age: 13-17 |
It's has been a long time since another Vampire movie came out. Very intersting storyline and plot. Must say that it was entertaining yet something almost lacking. Like the whole truth was not there. Still not bad. Favourite scene that plays on my mind is the Cullen family game.
| 9/10 | shazjoao@ - 1748 reviews 3.10.2011 - age: 36-49 |
Twilight is decently acted , but is kind of pointless at a lot of times.
| 6/10 | canadian_4life_26@ - 17 reviews 26.9.2011 - age: 18-25 |
I like the second and third movie way way better than this one, but it is still great.
| 6/10 | jazzyrocks.xox@ - 27 reviews 3.8.2011 - age: 13-17 |
I saw the first half of it and was bored it is a pure waste of time and money don't ever see any of the twilight movies.
| 1/10 | cutebluepanda@ - 29 reviews 13.3.2011 - age: 13-17 |
The best movie I have seen in ages. Absolutely enjoyed it. Can't wait to see Eclipse!
| 10/10 | al_bert_woo@ - 2 reviews 28.6.2010 - age: 1-12 |
This is everything I wanted to see and more. I love the romance and the way it makes you feel young again. It makes me feel like a teen before all the problems of the world come crashing on you once you become an adult and have some misfortune. Too bad guys can't be like some of the characters. Were totally missing the gentleman thing in our world, happy we get at least some of the fantasy in the movie!
| 10/10 | christinapapou@ - 3 reviews 2.6.2010 - age: 26-35 |
A great movie!!! You have to see it!!! And more then everything... you have to read THE TWILIGHT SAGA!!! : Of course the books are even great!!! :P
| 10/10 | malina3knada@ - 7 reviews 29.5.2010 - age: 18-25 |
I am writing this review of Twilight after having just seen New Moon, which I think in comparison is the better of the two. Twilight does a credible job of covering the novel, but as is usually the case, the film cannot go into nearly the same depth of emotion that is conveyed in writing. It was entertaining, but some of the casting and acting left me shaking my head. However, the actors do a better job in the second movie, so maybe they just needed a bit more time and perspective to start to "nail" their roles. When completed, the whole series will probably hang together better than the separate movies judged in isolation. Harry Potter is also in the same boat.
| 7/10 | gman@ - 37 reviews 2.2.2010 - age: 36-49 |
Obviously the worst movie of all time. Bella is boring, a horrid actress, selfish, whiny and ungrateful. EdTURD, I mean Edward, is a creepy, ugly, pedophilic stalker. This had no plot whatsoever, and has put feminism backwards, say, fifty years. If this was released in the sixties, there would be protests outside the theatres. What kind of messages does it send to girls? Run around with guys who put you in danger! This promotes abusive relationships! It's worse than the godawful novels, which is possibly the worst book of all time.
| 1/10 | coralbr@ - 3 reviews 17.1.2010 - age: 1-12 |
Interesting concept, excellent photography and special effects. Gets you into the saga.
| 8/10 | bkgoertz@ - 24 reviews 27.12.2009 - age: 36-49 |
It was really good, you know when your just about to leave the movie theater and you feel like nothing happened, that the two hours never happened! Well thatss what happened with me because its so awesome! I dont know how Stephanie Meyer had the idea to write that! Its unbaliavibly great! I'm speachless! Well I'm going to see new moon with my friends and I'm sure that I'm not wasting my money! :P
| 8/10 | assinagha@ - first review 22.11.2009 - age: 1-12 |
I don't know why people love this saga so much. Maybe I'll have to read the books to enjoy it because the movie is BAD! It really is a bad movie. I was expecting your average cheesy story and I was actually in the mood to watch something like that but it's not even a good cheesy movie! The acting is beyond disgusting... Robert P is one of the funniest actors ever... but wait... this isn't a comedy! The story is interesting but I felt like the movie was made for people who read the book because everything happens very fast and... whatever... it sucks!
| 4/10 | krayzie_lady@ - 224 reviews 20.11.2009 - age: 18-25 |
I absolutely loved this movie! It is a must see! It was so romantic! I loved how Edward does everything in his power to keep Bella safe.
| 10/10 | da_bomb_35@ - 2 reviews 19.11.2009 - age: 18-25 |
Excellent movie for ages (13 & up) appeals to both genders (romance & gore)a unique storyline. Really liked all the characters/actors. Can't wait to see the sequels.
| 8/10 | kcronan@ - 15 reviews 19.11.2009 - age: 36-49 |
I absolutely wouldn't recommend anyone to sit through what I sat through... It was a dull, boring movie ridden with teenage uncomfortable, ummms, ahhs, nervousness and biting of lips. There was no dialogue but a complete waste of time. I can appreciate a movie for entertainment sakes but this wasn't entertaining... where were the vampires? There was nothing vampire related in the movie at all... the characters weren't even appealing or made me like them. I definitely won't see the next movie nor read any of the books. Thumbs down... YAWN!
| 3/10 | mmullo@ - 13 reviews 19.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
Although the movie presents a simplistic version of the love story in the book, this is to be expected. Rich in detail and emotion, the book was able to convey more excitement than this movie but I thought the characters were well chosen and there was something about them that drew you in. The movie may seem cheesy and at times, incredible, but it's part of the fantastic genre. I recommend this movie for all females who dream of a prince charming out of the ordinary and who love to be enchated.
| 8/10 | me0kat@ - 60 reviews 17.11.2009 - age: 18-25 |
Boring and slow. Doesn't give vampires the respect they diserve.
| 1/10 | spunk135@ - first review 15.11.2009 |
This movie is so amazing... made me run out to the store and buy the books.
| 9/10 | cherry.blossom.2007@ - 2 reviews 13.11.2009 - age: 26-35 |
Omg this was a very good movie I cant wait to see new moon and eclipse!!!
| 9/10 | omerzetti@ - first review 13.11.2009 - age: 1-12 |
This was a very enjoyable movie. I know people who went and saw it 4 -5 times! It was not as good as the book but what can you expect. The fact that it is a vampire movie I know bothers some people but I do not believe it is what most people assume, twilight is a much more based on romance and I think girls/women are drawn by Edward simply because his character is such a gentleman.
| 9/10 | toocute4words_crystal@ - 2 reviews 11.11.2009 - One reply |
There was so much hype about this movie, but it turned out to be just OK. The acting was quite poor but it wasn't a bad story line.
| 7/10 | sssubmarine@ - 5 reviews 28.10.2009 - age: 26-35 |
A good film, the character development was weak in this one, just tried to hard to set up the story for the sequel, so hopeful the characters will gain more depth in new moon.
| 8/10 | ryoung@ - 95 reviews 27.10.2009 - age: 26-35 |
Awesome me and my sissy went to go see it and it was soo awesome.
| 10/10 | ccts4@ - 4 reviews 22.10.2009 - age: 1-12 |
Bbbrrriiillliiiaaannnttt!!! I love this film I could watch it 24/7 :D
| 10/10 | shiny101@ - first review 12.10.2009 - age: 13-17 |
Omigosh best movie ever!!! I cant wait till new moon.
| 10/10 | xo_megan.reany_xo@ - first review 18.9.2009 - age: 13-17 |
Very good storyline... however I still cannot get over the fact that this could have been done so much better. I wish this story wasn't written by a Mormon, and the movie wasn't directed by a bad director. It could be sooo much hotter and sexier and that part just frustrates me! Must read the book before watching this movie, otherwise I think anyone over the age of 12 would find it very immature. Even still I found I had a smile on my face the entire time.
| 8/10 | lilaim@ - 73 reviews 29.8.2009 - age: 18-25 - 2 replies |
I didn't want to see it at all, but my friend brought me anyways. I kind of liked it, but not the stunts or whatever. Has anyone noticed you can see the "Vampires" in the mirrors?
| 6/10 | mikedirnt_13@ - first review 23.8.2009 - age: 13-17 |
I have seen this Movie 100 times and I still love it watch it now it's the best movie ever I love it and it has great romance and adventure.
| 10/10 | animal_girl@ - 3 reviews 22.8.2009 - age: 1-12 |
It's great!!! I love it! It's fantastic! See it as soon.
| 10/10 | amis_gh@ - 2 reviews 21.8.2009 - age: 18-25 |
Before reading the novel I watched the movie first. I thought that the movie was well done and it made me fall in love with Twilight. But after reading the novel I was very dissapointed in how little the movie represented the novel. I really hope that the director for New Moon will try to make the movie almost identical to the book! All in all I really love the series and I cant wait to see all the movies.
| 6/10 | brannan14_shedevil@ - first review 21.8.2009 - age: 18-25 |
Amazing, exciting from start to finish. Can't wait for new moon! I've read the whole book saga three times! A masterpiece! I LOVED it, it keep my eyes glued to the screen the WHOLE time. Stephanie Meyer is absolutely AMAZING! I wish I was that AMAZING of a writer! W-O-W!
| 10/10 | funny_bunny_kiersten_171@ - first review 20.8.2009 - age: 1-12 |
Great movie loved it read all the books 6 times watched it 80 times and counting.
| 10/10 | stacey_emes@ - 2 reviews 17.8.2009 |
This movie was horrible. I mean I totally LOVED the books and the series, but this movie ruined for me. It was so low budget, the actors can't act. Just horrible.
| 1/10 | sh3iila@ - first review 19.7.2009 - age: 13-17 - One reply |
Well, at first I was like: oh my god. Best movie ever! But now that I've seen it a few times I realised that it was very slow. I was ashamed of how they picked Taylor for Jacob and what's with the long hair? Anyway, Rob did a o.k. job, Kristen was quite bad but Asley Greene was amazing! (a. k. a., Alice Cullen) Well, it's worth seeing, can't wait to see what they'll do for New Moon!
| 7/10 | alicegendron@ - first review 18.7.2009 - age: 1-12 - One reply |
It was an okay movie. I read the books which is the main reason why I watched the movie just to see if they matched up well. I think they did the best they could but it could have been better.
| 6/10 | xox_delta94@ - 148 reviews 11.7.2009 - age: 13-17 |
Could be much much better, the movie is made for teenage girls, and they are the ones who mostly like it, pretty lame, but not too too bad, it's a pass for me, but I'm still glad I waited for the DVD.
| 6/10 | morethan_ajedi@ - 4 reviews 7.7.2009 - age: 13-17 |
Absolutely amazing I LOVED it i don't think theres ever going to ever be a saga like the Twilight saga By:Stephenie Meyer!
| 10/10 | aieamaya14@ - first review 2.7.2009 - age: 1-12 - 4 replies |
It was a good movie but I found it gave me the creeps and I didn't really like all the romance.
| 7/10 | jandison8@ - 7 reviews 26.6.2009 - age: 1-12 |
Slow story, not enough action/fighting scenes between the vampires. There was only one scene and it was short and not exciting at all. When the movie ended, I don't even recall any significant scenes or anything much happened. I'm quite disappointed after a high expectation from the feedback for this movie. I think this is more for highschool students to watch.
| 6/10 | ensommers@ - first review 14.6.2009 - age: 26-35 |
Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.
Click to see more reviews:
[1-50]
[51-100]
[101-150]
[151-200]
[201-250]
[251-300]
[301-350]
[351-400]
[401-450]
[451-500]
[501-550]
[551-600]
[601-650]
[651-700]
[701-750]
[751-800]
[801-850]
[851-900]
[901-950]
[951-1000]
[1001-1050]
[1051-1100]
[1101-1150]
[1151-1200]
[1201-1250]
[1251-1300]
[1301-1350]
[1351-1400]
[1401-1450]
[1451-1500]
[1501-1550]
[1551-1600]
[1601-1650]
[1651-1700]
[1701-1750]
[1751-1800]
[1801-1850]
[1851-1900]
[1901-1950]
[1951-2000]
[2001-2050]
[2051-2100]
[2101-2150]
[2151-2194]
Did you see ''Twilight''?
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.
© 1996-2013 CinemaClock Canada Inc.
