Log in / Sign up
 
    Share this page

    Forrest Gump

    Advertisement

    Reviewed by
    pietroantoni@

    A sweet movie of sorts, but way over-praised and one that should not have won Best movie of the year and a second Best Actor Award for Tom Hanks. The film is difficult to see even a second time. It's just too long and most improbable. Pulp Fiction was robbed as Best Film as was John Travolta for Best Actor in Pulp Fiction. In retrospect just a fair saccharine movie, one that will not outlive the brilliant Pulp Fiction. I don't care for it much at all!

    2
    HelpfulNot helpful  Reply
    pietroantoni@  17.8.2015 age: 36-49 14,593 reviews

    Pulp Fiction wouldn't have won. It was this or Shawshank. And Tom Hanks deserved Best Actor. John Travolta was nothing special at all […]

    HelpfulNot helpful Reply
    guiseppe@  4.10.2015 age: 13-17 124 reviews

    Show all reviews for this movie
    Note: The texts posted on this page reflect personal opinions of our users. We are not responsible for their content.

    Did you see ''Forrest Gump''?

    There is a problem with your e-mail address and we are unable to communicate with you. Please go to My Account to update your email.

    How do you rate this movie?

    Select stars from 1 to 10.
    10 - A masterpiece, go, see it now
    9 - Excellent movie, a must see
    8 - Great movie, don't miss it
    7 - Good movie, worth seeing
    6 - Not bad, could be much better
    5 - So so, okay if you don't pay
    4 - Not good, even if you don't pay
    3 - Poor movie, not recommended
    2 - Very bad, forget about it
    1 - Worst ever, avoid at all costs

    Please explain. Write your comment here:

    Please choose a username to sign your comments. Only letters, digits, dash - or period. Minimum 4 characters.

    Your age and sex:

    We publish all comments, except abusive, at our discretion.