À noter que ce commentaire a été écrit en anglais.
I really wanted to like this movie more than I did, and perhaps I was not being fair as I watched, comparing it to the original it is supposed to top (otherwise why bother), but the only place in which this movie succeeded was in art direction, and even that was marred by some really bad choices for camera work and editing. The camera is being shot in 'documentary' style handheld (even though technically it may not have been handheld, the screen is still bobbing all over the place) Ultra fast action cutting (a style of action shooting/editing developed because it permits shooting with incompetent fighters and their incompetence is not obvious because no one can get a clear clear look at what is happening), when that is combined with a 3D screen, the end result is that I had absolutely no idea what was happening on screen whenever there was action, and that was most of the time. Action most of the time because, as much as the original was panned for lack of story, the plot of this story I could write into a single paragraph. And as much as the critics panned Arnie for his acting in the original, he was a far more convincing actor there than his wannabe here. The original's soundtrack was a masterpiece, this one's was utterly forgettable. I could go on, but this movie is not worth more of my time. This will probably be my biggest disappointment of the year.
|4/10||panpiper@ - 124 critiques|
23.8.2011 - âge: 50+
N.B. Le commentaire publié sur cette page est une opinion personnelle de l'usager. Nous ne sommes pas responsables de son contenu.