|
Showing reviews from 151 to 200 (total: 547)
|
|
 |
It was an awesome movie! I would give it a 10/10 you have to go see it, it was awesome!
10/10
28.7.2004 -
legolas_rules_82@ - age: 13-17
This movie surprised me as I really did not care for the first one. (I took my 10 yr. Old son and 13 yr old. ) Dunst did a great job as did the rest of the cast. It wasn't a hokey superheroes movie as I thought it might be, but really developed the characters nicely. Take the movie for what it was meant for, grab some popcorn and... be entertained!
8/10
28.7.2004 -
iasj23@ - age: 36-49
Great is a good discription, but personally I enjoyed the first better. For some reason it felt a little long and repetitive. Maybe I went expecting more than I really saw. The acting is great and of coarse the special effects are good as well but the story needed more work.
8/10
28.7.2004 -
mcsilva@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
A great movie! Great action and graphics and above all a great story. Can't wait for the 3rd movie.
9/10
28.7.2004 -
jlow86@ - age: 36-49
This Movie Was Great! I especially liked the chipmunks fighting for the humungous acorn. Mr Hippo was too fat but GO SEE SPIDERMAN 2 anyway!
10/10
28.7.2004 -
danbarbanddavid@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
A lot of people wrote that "it's not better than the first one" or that "it's predictable". Well I just want to let you know that Peter parker cannot just stay the loser type or... Well skip this part cause I'm gonna tell you the movie he can't just hide to M-J that he is Spierman... And no, we can't put a monster with four faces et 45 feet tall... Of course Spiderman 2 is predictable, on what do you think the movie is based:on comic books, so yes, in spiderman the guy is beaten by a radioactive spider (nowadays it's genetically enhanced) and Yes again in Spidey 2 he is going to tell her friend who he is... Of course, and I'm going to spoil the fun of the #3, he is even going to marry her... It;s in the comic books... And you know what, here is some breaking news, I'm not sure, but, I think that spiderman's secret identity is... Peter parker... amazing huh, I thought it was his aunt. Anyway, now that the predictable part has been taken care of, let me just say that the psychologie of the movie is really deeper than in the first one. And for true Spidey fans who spent their saturday afternoon ready Marvel books of Spiderman and the fantastic 4 and the Avengers (ahhh good old time... ) You will enjoy the movie. I think I might even go see it abother time... And I usually don't do it.
10/10
28.7.2004 -
matteo_el_muchacho@ - age: 18-25
Way better than the first one, not to say the first one wasen't that good but I liked the second one more, the story was a bit better in my opinion, I just hope they mix it up in the next one, sure would like to see Venom or Carnage soon.
10/10
28.7.2004 -
nitrogene2000@ - age: 18-25
Awesome better graphics that the first.
9/10
28.7.2004 -
karenfehr9@ - age: 26-35
Truly disappointing. I absolutely hated the first Spiderman movie. More romance than action yet it goes under as an action genre film. The movie lacked an interesting plot, but looking at other reviews that make the movie seem uplifting made me laugh. My friends spent large amounts of time trying to convince me to watch it. Finally they persuade me to watch Spiderman 2 with them. HA! Just as I thought it was as terrible if not even worst than the first. Who cares about Mary Jane! I wish the script and plot followed more of the original Marvel comic book storyline. If it resembled X-Men that was excellent! They followed the Marvel comic/cartoon version of X-Men which turned out great. There should have added slight details but I still loved it. I am hoping there isn't going to be a third, but... there probably will be.
1/10
27.7.2004 -
acoustic_angel87@ - age: 13-17
I have to admit I was quite dissappointed with the second Spider Man. Granted it was better than the first. Although Tobey Mcguire isn't very convincing as being in love with M-J, more of an invatuation and Kirsten Dunst is slightly more convincing however seems like she's more in love with being in love. The effects are nothing to wow at so for this, I'd recommend to watch it at home and save some money. Overall entertaining however a few parts where you roll your eyes a little. Also a little note: try to see this movie at 9:00 when there are no kids around. A 7:30 showing seems was still too early and you have kids talking and making comments throughout the whole movie. Just a friendly tip.
6/10
27.7.2004 -
cbelafi@ - age: 18-25
I love this movie!! It's honestly the best superhero movie made. The whole story has more meaning compared to other superhero movies."with great power comes great responsibility" hehe... Compared to the 1st, this one has more comedy, drama and action in it. Spiderman2 gets more detailed with Peter Parker's life, it's so interesting! Even the soundtrack is amazing! Danny Elfman is incredible! It was a GREAT movie! Go see it as much as you can... watch it in imax!
10/10
27.7.2004 -
coralie_w@ - age: 13-17
Very good.
9/10
27.7.2004 -
kmanrvdrocks@ - age: 1-12
Go see now.
9/10
27.7.2004 -
nugikitten@ - age: 13-17
I really liked the movie, however I thought that spiderman's identity was suppossed to be a mystery. Go see it. It will be worth it but I think they should have ended it here.
8/10
27.7.2004 -
rb40@ - age: 36-49
FANTASTIC!!! My councellor at camp said it was corny and cheesy and there was no action, boy was he wrong! This movie was great, lots of action like the train fight between Doc Ock and Spiderman, and when there at the bank throwing money bags at eachother! Last bit of the movie was a bit predictable how she left the wedding so she could be with Spiderman. Its also weird how he reveals himself to the world at the train battle. Non the less great movie lots of ass kicking! Worth the money.
10/10
27.7.2004 -
creno141@ - age: 13-17
This was really a waste of my most valuable time. The special effects are really bad and the story leaves to be desired. In spiderman 1, the hero's identity could have been revealed many times however it seemed that Peter Parker had too much luck for that to happen. However In this sequel Almost everybody sees the face of the true Spiderman. WHat the hell is that? A hero shoul dbe torn between the desire to live his life and the one of serving others. NOT GET EVERYTHING HE COULD EVER WISH FOR!!!
3/10
27.7.2004 -
vatchem16@ - age: 1-12
Man. This is the best movie I've ever seen in my life! Doc Ock's tentacles looked so realistic! I have a admit, a few parts were cheesy but I mean who has ever made a perfect film? But in my point of view, this is a perfect one.
10/10
27.7.2004 -
whitewolf45497@ - age: 13-17
Fake romance, fake drama. Boring. It's worse than the first one. The action scenes of this one are a little better than the first..
3/10
27.7.2004 -
anas9@ - age: 18-25
It was definitaly a lot better than the first one, but still didn't meet up to my expectations or hopes...
7/10
27.7.2004 -
b_c,levy@ - age: 26-35
I loved it! I thought it was as good, maybe even better then the first and I cant wait to buy it on dvd.
10/10
27.7.2004 -
sexaysugababy@ - age: 13-17
Awesome movie!!! It was great! I love it alot. I really enjoy watching it just like the comics. A must see movie... Go and Check it Out!!!
9/10
26.7.2004 -
tommyboy1971@ - age: 26-35
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
People are saying, no action/not enough action... ARE YOU KIDDING ME? What more can you ask for, ass-kicking the whole 2 hours? It has to sit on some kinda of respectable storyline. I was very unimpressed with the First spider-man, but was extremely pleasantly suprised by the sequel. Much better acting, much better/more action, but I feel he was way to superman-ish *Spolier*----I. E when he was holding the wall over mary jane, that was pretty supermanesque, but meh, good movie nonetheless.
9/10
26.7.2004 -
spankie_97@ - age: 13-17
Way better than the first, spidey kicks ass.
9/10
26.7.2004 -
michealb@ - age: 1-12
This movie was a HIT! I would og see this movie ASAP!
10/10
26.7.2004 -
gamer_guy91@ - age: 13-17
Now... to talk about a good sequel is very rare. But this movie does it well, and Alfred Molina did the best Doc Ock that no one else could do. Definitely a must-see a. s. a. p. but the love crap in the movie is kind of unbearable. But it's worth it. And I must say Kirsten Duntz is very good-looking. But her ending scene was a little screwed. Other than that it was a good sequel which says alot. :)
9/10
26.7.2004 -
to_hell_and_back666@ - age: 18-25
Loved it. The first movie was really good, but I found the second one even better. Loved the elevator scene...'great costume'. Can't wait to see part three.
9/10
26.7.2004 -
dixandar@
The movie was pretty good, although it kind of dragged on but other then that it was great! Well wrote Well acted, Worth seeing.
8/10
26.7.2004 -
sparkle_chick_03@ - age: 13-17
Spiderman 2 was definitely better than the first. Less time was wasted on origins and Toby MacGuire was again quite successful in playing a flawed Peter Parker.
9/10
26.7.2004 -
ryanmsmith@ - age: 18-25
Freakin amazing.
10/10
26.7.2004 -
rocket_pocket3003@ - age: 18-25
It's so bad it's funny. I checked out the theatre decor, and the reaction of other people because I ran out of popcorn and I was bored. There was the thinnest excuse for a plot. There was no character development. They kept focusing in on KD, like we should wallow in her beauty but she's just not that beautiful. She is charasmatic, but you barely see that here. Probably the best performance was by the Aunt, but her talent was wasted here. And what's up with trying to ellicit pity for superheros? What a shame. The only reason we stayed was because the theatre was air conditioned and my place is not. I won't be wasting my time or money on Spidey 3.
2/10
25.7.2004 -
lanidracl@ - age: 36-49
This movie was pretty bad. More screaming and fake close calls than Jurassic Park! And how do mechanical arms take over someones mind?
3/10
25.7.2004 -
mike257257@ - age: 36-49
J--- this is the summer movie! It is a great follow up to the first with amazing action and special effects and a fantastic ending. Perfectly done with impressive acting and a great story line. It is very good! This is review master J... n im out! Go see my other recent reviews with the J in front of em. ;)
9/10
25.7.2004 -
da_nicest_guy@ - age: 13-17
Great special f/x... fun and entertaining for the whole family!
9/10
25.7.2004 -
shsmith3@ - age: 26-35
Spiderman's nemesis and the movie's special effects (which are great) are overshadowed here by the relationships and the love in Peter Parker's life - one of a superhero or an "ordinary nerdy college student" - or BOTH! Spiderman's battles with Doc Ock are exciting and the runaway subway had me thinking "FRENCH CONNECTION" - great cinemetogrpahy, but Peter and MJ's love story is still the main theme. The stage has also been set for Spiderman-3.
8/10
25.7.2004 -
boywonder_eh@ - age: 36-49
I thought this movie had some of the best special effects I have seen. Definitely a theatre movie!
8/10
24.7.2004 -
edlundrigan@ - age: 26-35
Wow, what a great movie! I think that it's far more better than the first one. The CGA is superb! They put a lot of effort to blow your mind away! There is a love story and although it can seem cheesy, it sure works for the girls. The only problem I find is that this movie was is G rated. I think it should've been rated 13+. There are quite some violent scenes that are not suitable for young children.
9/10
24.7.2004 -
natalie_hang@ - age: 18-25
I give this movie a rating of 8, but it's really somewhere between 7 and 8. Now, don't get me wrong, I'm as big a Spidey fan as any one, still watch the original cartoon on late nights, but the second movie didn't have to do much to be better than the first. The first was full of flaws, CGI, writting, acting. Spider-Man 2, however, has done better than the first, in every catergory. The acting has improved greatly, the CGI was near flawless perfection compared to it's predecessor, and the story with dock-oc was surprisingly above par. Molina was a great casting choice, as is J Jonah Jameson. My one draw back is the same thing that killed the first movie. The ending. Far too long and drawn out. They're trying to make a love story out of one that simply isn't. But none the less, if you don't go see this in theaters, I will most likely kick you in the groin.
8/10
24.7.2004 -
spider_kyle@ - age: 18-25
This movie is awesome! Go see it if you haven't, you WON'T regret it! Even better than part one if you can imagine...
10/10
24.7.2004 -
crystal_mcgraw@ - age: 18-25
I think that the movie was very very poor. They made spiderman look like superman. It took forever to get to the point of the movie. But I think my favorite part was THE END (hint hint) I dont get what the fuss over it was. I think scooby-doo is better than spiderman 2.
3/10
24.7.2004 -
volleyball_hottie72@ - age: 13-17
EXCELLENT MOVIE! I really enjoyed Spiderman Two. All the actors did an excellent job. I was so pleased to see such a good sequel and I hope there is more sequels of spiderman to come.
10/10
24.7.2004 -
shyone197723@ - age: 26-35
It's is a good movie u got to see it to belevie it.
10/10
24.7.2004 -
ahmedleonardo414@ - age: 13-17
The best spidy movie yet ; Matt raffle.
10/10
23.7.2004 -
doormatt@ - age: 13-17
I really enjoyed this movie... more then the first. That is saying alot for sequels. This is a must see...
8/10
23.7.2004 -
joseph_christa@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
I really liked it, It'd rate it about the same as the first, maybe a little better. I love the actor who plays doc oc he was really good, I actually saw it several weeks ago now so it isn't quite as fresh in my memory, but I think I'm gonna go and see it again anyway. Definitely worth seeing.
9/10
23.7.2004 -
m_j_w_87@ - age: 13-17
It rock, way better than the first, the fight scenes where the best I have seen. EVER.
10/10
23.7.2004 -
thebluewizard@ - age: 26-35
I think I lied the first one better... I did enjoy this one to the fullest though... Loved the web swinginglol/...
7/10
23.7.2004 -
nevik@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
I'm sorry I couldn't give this a higher rating. I think the actors did a fine job with what they were given. They were just given a crappy, crappy script, overblown emotions (googly eyes between hero and heroine, psychosis for villian, emotionally distraught and conflicted villian-in-waiting), "thank you for flying exposition airlines! " speeches, and in one action sequence, painfully predictable and kinda stupid choices and results (and the CGI went overboard in that scene too, though I praise them for learning from their CGI mistakes in the first film) The budget was way too big, the crowd scenes were ridiculously fabricated (note all the extra girls rushing in on cue, with looks of wonder on their faces! ), and there were gaping tracts that were either not explained or were completely unnecessary. Oh, and I love how the ladies delicately kicked their legs when they were in the clutches of the villian. Spider-Man is a comic book movie, and so you must be willing to suspend your disbelief. However, the producers of this movie banked on your participation in this manner, and converted this account of good-will into their account of hard cash. I felt ripped off and taken advantage of. Mark my words - there will be a third. I hope they choose one and only one writer (fat chance), pay him or her a chunk of change from the extras and CGI budget, and produce a film that doesn't fall with a thud like a set in a sound studio.
5/10
23.7.2004 -
jasorensen@ - age: 26-35
Everything holds well together... plot, love story, special effects... worth it!
8/10
23.7.2004 -
franca1@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
Better than the first.
6/10
23.7.2004 -
roxier@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
It was bad, what was sooo good about it? The only part I liked was THE END *hint* *hint* seriously BORING.
3/10
22.7.2004 -
hermonie_danger02@ - age: 13-17
| 
