|
Showing reviews from 101 to 150 (total: 547)
|
|
 |
I Loved this movie!! The actors were great, the special effets were verry good:) Real good movie:)
10/10
7.8.2004 -
christinarubio@ - age: 13-17
I found this to be a great movie, much better then I thought it . william clark.
8/10
7.8.2004 -
williamclark67@ - age: 50+
They Emphasis on soul-searching, which last to long. Besides that It was a good movie. Can't wait for spider-man 3.
7/10
7.8.2004 -
dark_shadow7@ - age: 18-25
Even better then the first one!
9/10
6.8.2004 -
themaumau@ - age: 26-35
Pretty bad... but I would not recommend it to anyone. Also a bit unrealistic with the graphics.
2/10
6.8.2004 -
isaac_10@ - age: 18-25
Great movie! As good as the first one!
10/10
6.8.2004 -
azn69dude@ - age: 18-25
Spiderman 2 certainly does not disappoint. There is lots of action, and a couple of things that happen (don't want to spoil it though)that I think we were all happy to see. Definitely worth seeing, however, I still liked Spiderman 1 better!
7/10
4.8.2004 -
cheryl-swan@ - age: 36-49
It was sooo awesome but the price is way tooo expencive. 10-10.
10/10
4.8.2004 -
junebug4000@ - age: 13-17
The first one was amazing, and number 2 is UNBELIEVABLE! Definitely worth seeing!! 10/10!!
10/10
4.8.2004 -
mattman913@ - age: 13-17
Best movie ever if you think it isnt then your messed in the head!
10/10
4.8.2004 -
myoho69@ - age: 13-17
Great movie. I wasnt impressed with the first one, but this one is very good. It has more 'meat' in it this time, and it had some funny moments in it as well. I liked the editor guy for the paper, , doc ock, and of course spidey himself. I'm interested in seeing a third one, although I kindaof hoped theyd put Venom into it somehow, as that guy is awesome, kindaof the anti-spiderman. However, the thrid one will be good, I think.
9/10
4.8.2004 -
promax44@ - age: 13-17
This was a really really really great movie. Everyone should be watching this movie. Sure there were a few areas in the movie where it brought down the movie, but the strengths of this movie lift this way up to becoming the best darn superhero movie EVER! This will be the most fun you'll have at the movies so far.
9/10
4.8.2004 -
tainese@ - age: 18-25
I am bit disappointed in this movie - I should say. I saw this movie recently and the hype is not justified - I felt. For one thing, visual effects are good; some scenes involving Peter Parker and his Aunt; Peter Parker and MJ are really sensitive. The elevator scene is hilarious. Asian Lady singing spider man song and Spidey telling kids about eating lot of greens are funny. And, thats pretty much about it. DocOck is just okay. May be we got used to spidey jumping between sky-scrapers and all. Having said that, I must admit this is worth seeing as it is real summer pop-corn movie.
7/10
4.8.2004 -
srinadh0@ - age: 26-35
It was really good if u watched the first one u gotta go see this one is AWEESOMMeee!!!
10/10
4.8.2004 -
paulmanoian9@ - age: 13-17
A very good movie. I also liked Doc Ock more than the green goblin. (Did anybody else notice the face in the mindow at the end of the movie beside MJ? )
9/10
4.8.2004 -
cj_wieler@ - age: 13-17
Wish I had gone to see it earlier. Great movie.
9/10
4.8.2004 -
searles@ - age: 36-49
Great stuff! Another master creation from the director Sam Raimi!! Watched it and getting ready for one more time buddy!!
9/10
4.8.2004 -
spoorthi@ - age: 36-49
It was pretty boring in the beginning but a great movie nontheless. To much romance.
8/10
3.8.2004 -
gold_fishy@ - age: 1-12
Very good movie. Went the other day and was well worth the wait and I plan on seeing it again. Action, good story, good acting, all of this kept me riveted to the show. When Doc Oc climbs up walls you can feel him coming as the sound in the theater I was in was jarring(which I like)
9/10
3.8.2004 -
goldhawke@ - age: 36-49
I found that this movie was not only one of the best movies ive seen this year it was one of the best ive ever seen. I was never to big of a spiderman fan before the first came out but since then ive lived for spiderman and this movie fulfiled my expectations I think everybody should see it right now.
10/10
3.8.2004 -
jon_omega50@ - age: 13-17
Sequels tend to have a hrd time following up to the originals. This movie followed up well to the first and is for sure worth a look if you have seen the first. Lots of actions and effects were well done. Looking forward to the third.
9/10
3.8.2004 -
doug403@ - age: 18-25
Best move ever!!!
10/10
3.8.2004 -
jmendisss3@ - age: 18-25
Spiderman 2 is the best movie ever it is packed with action trust me everyone should see it.
10/10
3.8.2004 -
martin@ - age: 1-12
Not spectacular, but as far as sequels go, this is well worth seeing.
8/10
3.8.2004 -
ladybrady@ - age: 36-49
This movie stink very bad so dont make it a lot of money because its worthe 25cent.
1/10
2.8.2004 -
g_unit_33@ - age: 26-35
Awesome Movie full of persective then the first one lots of action its worth seeing on the big screen.
9/10
2.8.2004 -
chrisn93@ - age: 13-17
Spider man 2 I dont got much to say but go see it it's the best movie ever! ~shpiroth~.
10/10
2.8.2004 -
soso@ - age: 13-17
VERY entertaining and better plotline than the first.
9/10
2.8.2004 -
jedstorm@ - age: 26-35
Loved this movie, I know most of it was special effects but when he was moving through New York City I was right there with him... Amazing, I was thinking this needs to be a ride at Disneyland(maybe it is). I definitely would recommend seeing it, we chose Imax which gives a whole different experience...
9/10
1.8.2004 -
rollercoas1@ - age: 36-49
This sequel has a vastly improved plot as well as greater character development. The special effects are incredible. A very human SUPERHERO!!
8/10
1.8.2004 -
cbayards@ - age: 36-49
It was awesome, I loved it. Watch it... now.
10/10
1.8.2004 -
tekko_mekko91@ - age: 13-17
Too much soul-searching. The mush was overdone. Not enough effects.
5/10
1.8.2004 -
ariellegarellek@ - age: 18-25
I hated spider-man 2! Where was the action? I paid 8.50$ to see action and all I got was a romantic drama! Come On! What were they thinking? Also, I just didn't like some of the things they did... if you seen it you know what I mean... ( hint: spiderman on the train)
4/10
1.8.2004 -
moviefanaticccc@ - age: 13-17
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
I didn't like the first much, but it was a decent watch. Figured this would be better. Um, no. Firstly, END THE MOVIE WHEN IT SHOULD END! God, this movie was easily 15 minutes too long. The end just drags on with useless crap and you find yourself praying the next screen is the credits. Now the movie is nothing special. It was basically the first movie with a different story. Nothing new. And what the hell was with him losing his powers? That was just plain stupid. But not as bad as half of the city seeing his face. And I was really hoping the next would be Venom or something COOL, but instead looks like they're going to be stupid and go with another Goblin. Fun. Anyway, I went with 3 and we were all disappointed. Some might like it better than the first but there is NO way this movie deserves anything above a 5. Wanna see an awesome summer movie? Bourne 2!
2/10
1.8.2004 -
spyblog@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
Everyone knows there's a 3rd and if I heard correctly, there'll b a 4th, I know this cuz as soon as the first movie got so popular, he was signed for 3 more movies. But about the movie, it was pretty damn good, I really enjoyed it.
9/10
1.8.2004 -
ointment_15_15@ - age: 13-17
Excellent. Has a wee bit of drag in it but the effects are spectacular. 100% quality Hollywood escapism.
9/10
31.7.2004 -
michael_roberts1@ - age: 26-35
Awesome movie.
10/10
31.7.2004 -
david_goertsen@ - age: 1-12
Awesome movie if u dont see it your missin out.
10/10
31.7.2004 -
viggorocks_9@ - age: 1-12
This movie was bad. They made this just to make a sequel and make more money. Bad effects, bad acting. They weived a web they couldnt get out of this time.
4/10
31.7.2004 -
sendsaybonsai@ - age: 26-35
Predictable and slow.
5/10
31.7.2004 -
aurorainternet@ - age: 26-35
I enjoyed the movie overall but I would have preferred to see more action and less character development. Excellent production, cheesy storyline.
6/10
31.7.2004 -
djnicholls1@ - age: 36-49
The only thing worth seeing in this movie is the action scenes. The plot with MJ & Peter would have been a welcome counter, if I was an insomniac. Doc Ock's character was the most interesting, but fell far short of making the story interesting enough to enjoy. Hopefully they take Peter's character beyond his angst in the third film, either that or not make it.
6/10
31.7.2004 -
dominicproctor@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
Only reason I didn't give this a 10 is because it ended so soon. I wish there would have been another 2 hours to it. This is a DEFINITE MUST SEE!!!
9/10
31.7.2004 -
horrormoviefan2002@ - age: 26-35
What it lost in action it made up for in drama and character development. Is that a fair trade off? You'll have to decide. I would have like a bit more action, and the villain was a bit of a let-down... he lacked that evil edge (if there is such a thing) However, we get to see how Peter Parker works, much more than we ever saw Clark Kent or Bruce Wayne... so among the super hero movies, this is definitely the best series so far (with the exception of x-men of course) Is it better than the first one... I don't think that is a necessary comparison... it picks up where the first one left off. Go see it!
8/10
30.7.2004 -
apostolicman@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
Full of action and special effects. And they developped the characters, offering a deeper perspective than what we saw in the first movie. I found it to be very entertaining, a good action movie, with a good soundtrack; definitely worth seeing on the big screen!
7/10
29.7.2004 -
mmartirene@ - age: 36-49
Sooo cheeeseee.
5/10
29.7.2004 -
sanaz_94@ - age: 18-25
This movie was really worth-watching. I watched it twice and can still go for the third time. The plot is excellent. The visual effects are majestic and the most important thing is that the movie is so well made that it is griping. Even when Peter parker is having a minute long dialogue. The actors have acted very well. There are a lot of pessimistic people in the world who say that there were errors in the movie and that the movie is not realistic. I ask them what do you expect from a movie that is based on a comic book superhero? And about those mistakes... There are none! All of those people are just trying to excuse themselves from I don't know what! Go watch this movie. It is fantastic.
10/10
29.7.2004 -
whytheheckareyou@ - age: 18-25
Ahh I was dissapointed... it's not that good.
6/10
28.7.2004 -
jimmy_waii@ - age: 18-25
It's good... it was unexpected though.
8/10
28.7.2004 -
azn_colap@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
Great movie. It was better than the first one. The character development in the first movie is what made this one really great. If you were a fan of the old spider man cartoon, this was awesome. Great action, special effects, story was really good and modern, and there were some really funny parts. LOVED IT and can't wait for number 3 although it will be interesting to see if/how they bring back the goblin again and make it interesting since the villain and hero will know each other. I'm sure they'll do a great job.
9/10
28.7.2004 -
leevancauwenberg@ - age: 26-35
| 
